<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AI on General Ramblings</title>
    <link>https://fc4c6dbc.haigmail.pages.dev/categories/ai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AI on General Ramblings</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Lance Haig</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fc4c6dbc.haigmail.pages.dev/categories/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What if programming languages were designed for AI, not humans</title>
      <link>https://fc4c6dbc.haigmail.pages.dev/announcing-intent-programming-language-for-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://fc4c6dbc.haigmail.pages.dev/announcing-intent-programming-language-for-ai/</guid>
      <description>
        
          
            &lt;h1 id=&#34;what-if-programming-languages-were-designed-for-ai-not-humans&#34;&gt;What if programming languages were designed for AI, not humans?&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago I saw a post on social media -- someone asking whether it was time to create a programming language designed for consumption by code assistants. Not for humans to write, but for AI to generate and humans to verify.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I couldn&#39;t stop thinking about it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every programming language I use was designed for humans to write. Python optimizes for readability. Rust optimizes for safety. JavaScript optimizes for getting something on screen fast. They all assume a human is typing the code.&lt;/p&gt;
          
          
        
      </description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>